Cases 1 - 10 of 53,452
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00444
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Cobble et al v. Biden et al
as 1:2024cv02044
Plaintiff:
David Cobble and American Citizens
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Brad Raffensperger, Alexander Soros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Zwolensky v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01701
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Zwolensky
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Nelson v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv05034
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Noah Nelson
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Gonzalez v. Snyder et al
as 1:2024cv01382
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Gonzalez
Defendant:
David Snyder and Roland Sorge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01747
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Acuity v. Bluethread Services, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01300
Plaintiff:
Acuity
Defendant:
Bluethread Services, LLC doing business as Peak View Roofing, LLC, Peak View Roofing Co, Jeffrey Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Casas v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv03431
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Casas
Defendant:
United States of America, DEA Officers John Does 1-5, City of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Douglas v. Tangney et al
as 3:2024cv02801
Plaintiff:
Dalton Douglas
Defendant:
Jeffrey Tangney, Anna Bryson, Regina Benjamin, M.D. and others
Jeffrey Goodwin v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA
as 24-1852
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY R. GOODWIN, n his capacity as trustee of the Dorothy M. Goodwin Trust
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NA, d/b/a Chase Bank
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
