Cases 41 - 50 of 132
WILLIAMS v. CURTIS et al
as 1:2018cv00229
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT JENNIFER CLARK and CHIEF CURTIS
Plaintiff:
MICAH WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Illinois Department of Children and Family Services et al
as 2:2018cv02074
Plaintiff:
Alexandria A Washington
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, James Glenn, One Hope United and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv12346
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218
Melise v. Wall et al
as 1:2017cv00490
Plaintiff:
Stephen Melise
Defendant:
Ashbel T. Wall, Fred Vohr, Jennifer Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jefferson v. Raimondo et al
as 1:2017cv00439
Plaintiff:
Leonard C. Jefferson
Defendant:
Gina Raimondo , Ashbel T. Wall , Barry Weiner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority
as 7:2017cv07252
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Clark
Defendant:
Metropolitan Transportation Authority
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Cadle v. Tatum et al
as 6:2017cv00099
Plaintiff:
Daniel Cadle
Defendant:
Clayton Tatum, Jennifer Clark and Andrew McFarlane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yarborough v. Rogers State Prison et al
as 6:2017cv00081
Plaintiff:
Jerome William Yarborough
Defendant:
Rogers State Prison, Clay Tatum and Jennifer Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark et al v. New Creek Wind, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv00024
Plaintiff:
John Clark and Jennifer Clark
Defendant:
New Creek Wind, LLC, Everpower Wind Holdings, Inc. (Everpower) and Enbridge Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jordan et al v. Rogers State Prison et al
as 6:2017cv00029
Plaintiff:
Craig A. Jordan and Rogers State Prison Inmates
Defendant:
Rogers State Prison, Clay Tatum, FNU McFarlane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
