Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Fallon et al v. 18 Greenwich Avenue, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv09579
Defendant:
Rufio Lerma, Jennifer Doe, 18 Greenwich Avenue, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Gilberto Lucas Tolentino, Eutiquio Leon Garcia, Jose Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Reimann v. Templeton et al
as 1:2019cv00142
Defendant:
Jennifer "Doe", LaSalle Co. Sheriff Dept., "John" Armstrong and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob Reimann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mendez Mejia et al v. CJFour Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv04199
Plaintiff:
Mardoqueo Abilio Mendez Mejia
Defendant:
CJFour Inc., Tonghan Kim, Janet J Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2017cv03245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
N'JAI v. BRIGHTSIDE ACADEMY CORPORATE OFFICE et al
as 2:2016cv01018
Plaintiff:
JACQUELYN B. N'JAI
Defendant:
BRIGHTSIDE ACADEMY CORPORATE OFFICE, DAWN BROOKINS, WILLIAM RAFALOSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ernest Singleton v. Hector Alcala, et al
as 16-5005
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERNEST WILLIAM SINGLETON
Defendant - Appellee:
KENTUCKY STATE POLICE OFFICER HECTOR ALCALA, KSP OFFICER DENNIE S. MABRY, KSP OFFICER TIMOTHY JOE DIALS and others
Singleton v. Alcala et al
as 5:2015cv00131
Plaintiff:
Ernest William Singleton
Defendant:
Hector Alcala, Dennis S. Marby, Tim Dials and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roach v. Clark et al
as 5:2015cv00408
Plaintiff:
Matthew J. Roach
Defendant:
Jennifer Clark, Mary Woodfork, Christopher Warren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Liu et al v. Studio Nails & Spa, Inc. et al
as 7:2014cv09128
Plaintiff:
Al Ping Liu
Defendant:
Studio Nails & Spa, Inc., Hartsdale Floris Spa, and Nails Inc., Kyung Sil Ahn and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
