Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Lawrence v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65273
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Lawrence
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lawrence v. Kijakazi
as 0:2023cv01822
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Lawrence
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
BARAZAL et al v. PRO-SEAL USA, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv00100
Defendant:
Jennifer Lawrence, Lonnie Becude, Pro-Seal USA, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Livan Barazal and Osiel Barazal
Allen v. City of Leesville et al
as 2:2019cv00740
Defendant:
Jennifer Lawrence, Jim Lewis, City of Leesville and others
Plaintiff:
Teddy James Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terrence Buchanan v. Brian Hayes, et al
as 18-2731
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRENCE BUCHANAN
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIAN HAYES, TROY ENGER, JENNIFER LAWRENCE and others
Patterson v. Nelson et al
as 1:2017cv01227
Plaintiff:
Christopher James Patterson
Defendant:
Prince Rogers Nelson, Katy Perry, Jennifer Lawrence and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Lawrence v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 1:2014cv14360
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Lawrence
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Melvin Johnson v. Jennifer Webber, et al
as 09-6059
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MELVIN JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JENNIFER LAWRENCE WEBBER, Assistant United States Attorney, KNUDSON, Memphis Police Officer and LEE HOWARD GERALD, a private attorney
MCFADDEN v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2008cv00239
Plaintiff:
KENNETH J. MCFADDEN
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and JENNIFER LAWRENCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kimpel, et al v. Williams, et al
as 2:1993cv03441
Plaintiff:
Michael L Kimpel, David G Ross, Luke W Magee and others
Defendant:
Willie Williams, Does 1 through 25, inclusive and City of Los Angeles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
