Cases 11 - 20 of 87
THOMAS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv20139
Plaintiff:
JEROME THOMAS
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US v. Jerome Thomas
as 20-7309
Defendant / Appellant:
JEROME THOMAS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
THOMAS v. MUNICIPALITY OF BETHEL PARK et al
as 2:2020cv00479
Defendant:
MUNICIPALITY OF BETHEL PARK, ROBERT FASSINGER and TIMOTHY O'CONNER
Plaintiff:
JEROME THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunbar v. Avigdor
as 20-982
Defendant / Appellee:
Anthony Duff, Individual, Official Capacity, Anthony Campbell, Individually, Officially, 1630-Chapel LLC and others
Defendant:
Toni N. Harp, Individually, Officially, John DeStefano, Individually, Officially and David Shancupp, Individually, Officially
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jerome Thomas Dunbar
THOMAS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv03909
Plaintiff:
JEROME THOMAS
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THOMAS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv14848
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DARREN JEROME THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jerome Thomas, Jr.In re: Jerome Thomas, Jr.
as 19-15054
Petitioner:
In re: JEROME THOMAS, JR.
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Anderson v. Unknown
as 3:2019cv00934
Plaintiff:
Michael Christopher Anderson
Defendant:
Unknown, Moore, B. Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. United States of America
as 1:2019cv04830
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Jerome Thomas, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Thomas v. Kelly et al
as 6:2019cv06108
Defendant:
Jane Doe/Nurse Amanda, Mr. Jackson, Wendy Kelly and others
Plaintiff:
Alex Jerome Thomas, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
