Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Ruiz v. Shaw
as 2:2023cv00497
Plaintiff:
Omar Perales Ruiz
Defendant:
Jerry Shaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
SHAW v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv09701
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JERRY SHAW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
De Verges et al v. Board of County Commissioners of Pawnee County Oklahoma, The et al
as 4:2020cv00386
Defendant:
Mike Waters, City of Pawnee, Oklahoma, Board of County Commissioners of Pawnee, County Oklahoma, The and others
Plaintiff:
Eugene P De Verges, Mardi De Verges and Brittany M Weide
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. Lawrence County, Tennessee, et al
as 1:2019cv00036
Defendant:
Misty Anderson, LPN, Shawn Gentry, M.D., Northside Medical Professionals, PC and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Reginald Shaw
as 19-6387
Defendant / Appellant:
REGINALD JERRY SHAW
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Shaw v. USA
as 5:2018cv00182
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Reginald Jerry Shaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
US v. Reginald Shaw
as 17-4211
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
REGINALD JERRY SHAW
Shaw et al v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc et al
as 6:2015cv01161
Plaintiff:
Jerry Shaw and Anne Shaw
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc , Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc , Takeda Development Center Americas Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cobetto et al v. Amsted Rail Co., Inc.
as 3:2013cv00031
Plaintiff:
John Cobetto , Komi Denou , Kenneth Downing and others
Defendant:
Amsted Rail Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Wood v. Albertville, Alabama, City of
as 1:2012cv02670
Plaintiff:
Jerry Shaw Wood
Defendant:
Albertville, Alabama, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
