Cases 21 - 30 of 10,300
Burnell v. Montgomery et al
as 3:2024cv00683
Plaintiff:
Joe Baby Burnell
Defendant:
W. Montgomery, Ali Hasan, B. Lew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Goodwin v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Joe Lewis Goodwin
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and USP Leavenworth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Garrison v. No Named Respondent
as 3:2024cv00891
Petitioner:
Joe L Garrison
Respondent:
No named respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Delacerda (PS) v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2024cv01018
Plaintiff:
Joe Angel Delacerda
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crayton v. Pritzer et al
as 1:2024cv01142
Plaintiff:
Keimon Crayton
Defendant:
J B Pritzer, U.S. and Joe Biden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall v. Sterling
as 1:2024cv01769
Plaintiff:
Mimi Joe Marshall
Defendant:
Bryan P. Sterling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Sherrod v. Wexford Health Sources et al
as 1:2024cv01137
Plaintiff:
Joe N Sherrod
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Pamela E Hart, C Hansen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrison v. No Named Respondent
as 2:2024cv00117
Petitioner:
Joe L Garrison
Respondent:
No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garrison v. No Named Respondent
as 2:2024cv00118
Petitioner:
Joe L Garrison
Respondent:
No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eastwood v. Mingo County Commission et al
as 2:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Andrew Jackson Eastwood, Jr.
Defendant:
Mingo County Commission, Mingo County Sheriff Joe Smith, Deputy J. D. Tincher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
