Cases 51 - 60 of 98
Hart v. Doe et al
as 9:2013cv00260
Plaintiff:
Jerome Hart
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe, John Doe, 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Herrington v. Nixon et al
as 5:2013cv06022
Defendant:
Jeremiah W. Nixon, George Lombardi, MO Board of Probation & Parole and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob Andrew Herrington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grenning v. Klemme et al
as 2:2012cv00600
Plaintiff:
Neil Grenning
Defendant:
Risa Klemme, Craig D Harrington, Jack Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thelonious Henry v. City of Houston, et al
as 12-20609
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THELONIOUS PAUL HENRY
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF HOUSTON, CITY OF HOUSTON'S FIREFIGHTERS AND POLICE OFFICERS CIVIL SERVICE CMSN, HAROLD HURTT, Chief of Police and others
Gibson v. Doe et al
as 2:2012cv04239
Plaintiff:
Cedric Arnez Gibson
Defendant:
John I Doe, John 2 Doe and John 3 Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDaniels v. Kremen et al
as 2:2012cv01289
Plaintiff:
Peter J. McDaniels
Defendant:
Pete Kremen, Bill Elfo, Wendy Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitehead v. Lombardi et al
as 2:2012cv04183
Plaintiff:
David Levi Whitehead
Defendant:
George A. Lombardi, Missouri Department of Corrections, Matt Sturm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Singleton v. Snodgrass et al
as 4:2012cv00709
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey W Singleton
Defendant:
Ron Snodgrass, St. Clair County, John 1 Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stewart v. Miller et al
as 2:2012cv04160
Plaintiff:
Marvin L. Stewart, Sr.
Defendant:
Mark Miller, John I Doe, John 2 Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rossi v. City Of Houston Police Officers et al
as 4:2012cv00957
Plaintiff:
Steven D. Rossi
Defendant:
City Of Houston , John Doe, John #2 Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
