Cases 1 - 10 of 186
Singh Banga v. Kanios, et al.
as 24-2917
Plaintiff:
NAVJEET SINGH BANGA
Defendant:
CHRIS GUS KANIOS, DEAN BARBIERI, ELEANOR ARMSTRONG and others
Kennedy et al v. Michigan Secretary of State et al
as 2:2024cv11072
Plaintiff:
John F. Kennedy, III and Ramon Jackson
Defendant:
Michigan Secretary of State, Detroit Department of Elections, Detroit Clerk and others
Michael Titus v. Scarface, et al
as 24-1725
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus, ADC #168523
Defendant:
Scarface, Movie, Al Pacino, Director of Scarface, Keef Coff Group and others
Titus v Scarface et al
as 4:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus
Defendant:
Scarface, Al Pacino, Keef Coff Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KENNEDY et al v. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH PA
as 5:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
JOHN F KENNEDY and MONROE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT ADVISORS LLC
Defendant:
NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH PA
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Haley v. Haley et al
as 6:2024cv00059
Defendant:
FBI Agent John Moore, Huey Frank Haley, Amber Thibodeaux Haley and others
Plaintiff:
Patty Lee Haley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Kennedy et al v. Garcia et al
as 3:2023cv02603
Plaintiff:
John Fitzgerald Kennedy and Hilda Tobias Kennedy
Defendant:
Eddie Garcia, Michel Moore, Kimberly Cheatle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Randle v. Contra Costa Cnty. Super. Ct.
as 3:2023cv05799
Plaintiff:
Jason Thomas and Ramello D. Randle
Defendant:
Contra Costa County Superior Court of Martinez, Judge Horimoto, Judge Tharesa Canepa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Kennedy v. Warden of Perry Correctional Institution
as 23-7053
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN F. KENNEDY
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN OF PERRY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
