Cases 1 - 10 of 132
Criner v. Adams et al
as 4:2024cv00416
Plaintiff:
Phillip Criner
Defendant:
Richard Adams, Samuel Snyder and CO I John Doe Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Board of Pardons and Paroles
as 1:2023cv00210
Petitioner:
John Brown Lewis, IV
Respondent:
Board of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LEWIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv01893
Petitioner:
JOHN ALAN LEWIS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Lewis v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv01110
Plaintiff:
John G Lewis
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Lewis v. Wayburn
as 1:2023cv00170
Petitioner:
John Brown Lewis, IV
Respondent:
FNU Wayburn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Lewis v. Sullivan et al
as 1:2023cv00153
Plaintiff:
John Brown Lewis, IV
Defendant:
Gov. Greg Abott, Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, Ricky Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis et al v. Heger et al
as 1:2022cv00155
Plaintiff:
John M. Lewis and Joy Lewis
Defendant:
Ian Heger and Claudine L. Heger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Smithson v. Hammond et al
as 3:2022cv05029
Plaintiff:
Daniel B Smithson
Defendant:
Daryl Jonathan Hammond, Jane Doe Hammond, Sarah Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lewis v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv03066
Special Master:
Special Master
Plaintiff:
John W. Lewis
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc, Johnson & Johnson Services Inc, Johnson & Johnson Inc and others
Interested Party:
Plaintiffs Counsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lewis v. Young et al
as 7:2021cv00078
Plaintiff:
John W. Lewis
Defendant:
Sgt. Lisa Young and Lt. FNU Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
