Cases 51 - 60 of 73
Beougher et al v. Willow Bend Modern Dentistry, P.C. et al
as 4:2011cv00323
Plaintiff:
Ritchie D. Beougher and R. D. Beougher D.D.S, P.A.
Defendant:
Willow Bend Modern Dentistry, P.C., John Barnes and Pacific Dental Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Kelly v. Transportation and Security Administration
as 2:2011cv00246
Plaintiff:
John Barnes Kelly
Defendant:
Transportation and Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Calvin Rouse v. Ron Van Boening, et al
as 11-35200
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CALVIN ROUSE, AKA Abdur Rashid Khalif
Defendant - Appellee:
RON VAN BOENING, DENNIS TABB, JOHN BARNES and others
United Transportation Union, et al v. City of Albuquerque, et al
as 10-2234
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BEN D. ABEYTA, RICHARD T. ADAMS, JOHNNY AGUILAR and others
Defendant:
CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE, LAWRENCE RAEL, Chief Administrative Officer and MARTIN CHAVEZ, Mayor
Intervenor - Appellant:
JENNIFER BEAN and BEAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
BOWERS et al v. PANTHER RACING, L.L.C. et al
as 1:2010cv01317
Defendant:
JOHN BARNES, JOHN BARNES RACING, INC. and PANTHER RACING, L.L.C.
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BOWERS and Q SPORTS AND ENTERTAINMENT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
BARNES et al v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
as 1:2010cv00163
Plaintiff:
PETER JOHN BARNES and MICHELLE DENISE HEIDENRI BARNES
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Bergeron, et al v. Cabral
as 10-1012
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY TURLEY, DAVID BERGERON, JOHN BARNES and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ANDREA CABRAL, individually and as Sheriff of Suffolk County
Rouse v. Van Boening et al
as 3:2009cv05655
Plaintiff:
Calvin Rouse
Defendant:
Ron Van Boening, Dennis Tabb, John Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Cabral, et al
as 09-2111
Petitioner:
In re: ANDREA CABRAL
Respondent:
JOHN BARNES, DAVID BERGERON, ERIC DILBERTO and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
