Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Sheikh v. Burgess
as 18-571
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Rose Sheikh
Defendant - Appellee:
John Burgess, in his capacity as a Detective, New York City Police Department and individually
Sheikh v. City of New York, Police
as 18-570
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Rose Sheikh
Defendant - Appellee:
New York City Police Department, City of New York, New York City Department of Corrections and others
Willis v. Pfister et al
as 1:2018cv00333
Plaintiff:
Brian Willis
Defendant:
Randy Pfister, John Burgess, Darryl Jefferson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burgess v. Woodruff
as 5:2017cv05128
Plaintiff:
Robert John Burgess
Defendant:
Paul Woodruff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burgess v. Lee
as 3:2017cv03049
Plaintiff:
Robert John Burgess
Defendant:
Roy A Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burgess v. Lee
as 4:2017cv00428
Plaintiff:
Robert John Burgess
Defendant:
Roy A Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burgess v. Woodruff
as 4:2017cv00427
Plaintiff:
Robert John Burgess
Defendant:
Paul Woodruff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Mack, Jr. v. John Burge
as 15-7380
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN WILLIE MACK, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN BURGESS, Spartanburg City Police, In his Individual and Official Capacities, GEORGE DAVID REEVES, Custodian of Evidence For the Partanburg City Police Department, In His Individual and Official Capacities, MANUEL J. ORTUNO, Forensics Analyst of South Carolina Law Enforcement Division, In His Individual and Official Capacities and others
Burgess v. Mineni
as 1:2015cv00487
Counter_defendant:
United States
Plaintiff:
John Burgess
Counter_claimant:
Dennis Mineni
Defendant:
Dennis Mineni
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Boatin v. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
as 1:2014cv01008
Plaintiff:
Colin Christopher Boatin
Defendant:
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, Georege S. May International Co., John Burgess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
