Cases 11 - 20 of 40
Wright v. Dept. of Correction et al
as 1:2019cv02438
Defendant:
Warden Kissa Smalls, Captain Shivraj, Warden Walker and others
Plaintiff:
Jamek Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Illinois Department Of Corrections et al
as 3:2018cv01374
Defendant:
Guard Dulainey, Jacqueline Lashbrook, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
James Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Illinois Department Of Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv06825
Plaintiff:
James Johnson
Defendant:
Illinois Department Of Corrections, Wexford Health Services, Inc., John Baldwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owens v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2017cv00350
Plaintiff:
Albert T Owens
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, Secretary, Fla. Dep't of Corrections Prisons, S. Wheelhousen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Brockenberry et al
as 5:2016cv03192
Plaintiff:
Alfrigh Williams
Defendant:
Ruby Brockenberry, Belinda E Timmons, John Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Federal Medical Center Devens
as 1:2016cv11910
Petitioner:
John Carter
Respondent:
Jeff Grondolsky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Carter v. Independence Seaport Museum
as 15-1960
Plaintiff - Appellee:
INDEPENDENCE SEAPORT MUSEUM
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN CARTER
Irvin v. Mr. Irvin Enterprises et al
as 1:2015cv02444
Plaintiff:
Matthew Irvin
Defendant:
Mr. Irvin Enterprises, Brian Kemp, Fulton County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eddleman v. Carter et al
as 1:2015cv00441
Defendant:
Ken Anderson, Ray Bass, John Carter and others
Plaintiff:
Murry Christopher Eddleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARTER v. USA
as 3:2015cv00024
Petitioner:
JOHN CARTER
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
