Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Thomas Haynes v. LA Dept of Public Sfty & Corr, et al
as 16-30235
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS HAYNES
Defendant - Appellee:
LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONS, JAMES LEBLANC, Secretary, Individual and Official Capacity, BURL CAIN, Warden, Individual and Official Capacity and others
Sumrall v. Davis et al
as 4:2016cv00047
Petitioner:
Derrick Sumrall
Respondent:
Marcus Davis, John Doe Ray-Ray, John Doe Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Felks v. Holden et al
as 3:2016cv00143
Defendant:
City of Baker, Mark Holden, Avery Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Janet Felks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mergist v. Wal-Mart Stores,Inc.
as 3:2016cv00138
Defendant:
John Doe Johnson and Wal-Mart Stores,Inc.
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Mergist
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Sumrall v. Fisher et al
as 4:2016cv00034
Petitioner:
Derrick Sumrall
Respondent:
Marshall Fisher, Marcus Davis, John Doe Ray Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sumrall v. Fisher et al
as 3:2015cv00914
Plaintiff:
Derrick Sumrall
Defendant:
Marshall Fisher, Marcus Davis, John Doe Ray Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sumrall v. Davis et al
as 3:2015cv00913
Plaintiff:
Derrick Sumrall
Defendant:
Marcus Davis, John Doe Ray-Ray, John Doe Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boatman v. Sawyer et al
as 2:2015cv00132
Plaintiff:
Rayvon Boatman
Defendant:
Donald Sawyer, Rebecca Jackson, Malinda Masters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hobart v. Johnson et al
as 3:2015cv05083
Plaintiff:
Amanda N Hobart
Defendant:
Krysta I Johnson, John Doe Johnson and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
TOMPKINS v. POOLE et al
as 1:2014cv01074
Plaintiff:
STUART WAYNE TOMPKINS
Defendant:
KATIE POOLE, WILLIAM BULLARD, JERRY INGRAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
