Cases 1 - 10 of 250
ALSTON v. LITTLE et al
as 2:2024cv01574
Plaintiff:
LAMAR ALSTON
Defendant:
SECRETARY GEORGE LITTLE, SUPT. SORBER, SUPT. TERRA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Tjeerdsma et al
as 4:2024cv04068
Plaintiff:
Shane Douglas Bell
Defendant:
Kelly Tjeerdsma, Brian Foley, Kelly Wasko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NAIM v. CITY OF PERTH AMBOY et al
as 2:2024cv00842
Plaintiff:
MOHAMMED NAIM
Defendant:
CITY OF PERTH AMBOY, PTL. MUNOZ, JOHN DOE TOWING COMP. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DURHAM v. GANGI et al
as 3:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
TREMAYNE DURHAM
Defendant:
ANTHONY GANGI, S. LEWIS, L. RODRIGUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mills v. Dye et al
as 2:2023cv00206
Plaintiff:
Thomas Mills
Defendant:
Darrell DJ Dye, Perry County, Mississippi, Mitch Nobles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GAULT v. RIGOLI et al
as 1:2023cv22946
Plaintiff:
KEON JAHADD GAULT
Defendant:
SGT. RIGOLI, OFFICER R. HASENPAT, CUMBERLAND COUNTY JAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Gregory et al
as 3:2023cv00689
Plaintiff:
Omar Taylor
Defendant:
Alisa Gregory, John Doe Officer 1, John Doe Officer 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fisher v. Officer Agilanos et al
as 1:2023cv08763
Plaintiff:
Bryon Lamar Fisher
Defendant:
Officer Agilanos, John Doe Officer #1, John Doe Officer #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale-El v. Thornton Police Department, et al
as 23-1269
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COLBY JEROME HALE-EL
Defendant / Appellee:
THORTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, I. BARLOTT, Officer, ADAMS COUNTY JAIL and others
Mills v. Dye et al
as 2:2023cv00123
Plaintiff:
Thomas Mills
Defendant:
Darrell DJ Dye, John Doe Officers 1-10 and John Doe Entities 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
