Cases 21 - 30 of 42
Roberts v. Chase Home Finance, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv01356
Plaintiff:
Grady Roberts, Jr.
Defendant:
Chase Home Finance, LLC , Johnson & Freedman, LLC , Shanon McGinnis and others
Grimes et al v. Darrow et al
as 4:2013cv00051
Plaintiff:
John Grimes, Ralph Weaver and Bobby D Williams
Defendant:
Darrow and Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams et al v. Darrow et al
as 4:2013cv00026
Plaintiff:
Bobby Dwayne Williams, Ralph Weaver and John Grimes
Defendant:
Darrow and Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fox v. Leland Volunteer Fire/Rescue Department, Inc., et al
as 7:2012cv00354
Plaintiff:
Sara L. Fox
Defendant:
Leland Volunteer Fire/Rescue Department, Inc. and John Grimes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-13329
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Howell Woltz v. Thomas Scarantino
as 12-6619
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HOWELL W. WOLTZ
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THOMAS SCARANTINO, Camp Administrator, THOMAS CLIFTON, a/k/a Clifton and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2011cv03894
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Howell Woltz v. FCI Beckley
as 11-7470
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HOWELL W. WOLTZ, TEP
Defendant - Appellee:
FCI BECKLEY, FPC BECKLEY, JOHN GRIMES, Counselor and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-14504
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Robert Probert, et al v. Deborah Coxon
as 11-35312
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT PROBERT and LORETTA PROBERT
Plaintiff-intervenor - Appellant:
GENE GRISSOM, DONNA GRIMES, JOHN GRIMES and others
Intervenor-Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY DECKER and CARLA SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
DEBORAH L. COXON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
