Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Phillips v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv01367
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Plaintiff:
John Phillips
Hamre v. Sprout et al
as 0:2018cv02958
Defendant:
Officer Sprout, Fargo Forum, Robert Matheson and others
Plaintiff:
John Phillip Hamre
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamre v. Moorhead, City of et al
as 3:2018cv00142
Defendant:
Tristan Jones Van de Streek, Moorhead, City of, Robert Matheson and others
Plaintiff:
John Phillip Hamre
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamre v. Sprout et al
as 3:2018cv00138
Defendant:
Officer Sprout, Ryan Nelson, Robert Matheson and others
Plaintiff:
John Phillip Hamre
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamre v. Swan et al
as 3:2017cv00238
Plaintiff:
John Phillip Hamre
Defendant:
Philip C.R. Swan, Brent Malone, Wade L. Webb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2014cv00289
Plaintiff:
John Phillips
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Boland et al v. L. Pontello Tile & Marble, Inc. et al
as 4:2012mc00399
Plaintiff:
James Boland , Henry Kramer , Ken Lambert and others
Defendant:
L. Pontello Tile & Marble, Inc. and Roman Stone, Inc.
United States v. Edward Raifsnider
as 11-1353
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Edward Lee Raifsnider, also known as William Biaselli, also known as John E. Scott, also known as Edward John Snider, also known as Scott Emmy, also known as Tom L. Smith, also known as Rick Williams, also known as John Phillips, also known as George Thom
Flynn, et al v. D & R Masonry, Inc, et al
as 1:2010mc00102
Plaintiff:
John Flynn , James Boland , Gerald O'Malley and others
Defendant:
D & R Masonry, Inc and A & S Masonry, Inc
Beall v. Turner et al
as 6:2008cv06062
Plaintiff:
John Phillip Beall, Jr
Defendant:
David Turner and Jackie Newburn
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
