Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00354
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 19-1900
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Richardson v. Watson
as 2:2019cv01452
Defendant:
Rochelle Watson and IRS
Plaintiff:
John W Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Watson
as 2:2019cv01189
Defendant:
Rochelle Watson
Plaintiff:
John W Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Family Court et al
as 2:2019cv00837
Defendant:
Family Court and DHR
Plaintiff:
John W Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Giuseppe Giudice v. Attorney General United States
as 19-1869
Petitioner:
GIUSEPPE GIUDICE, a/k/a Joe Giudice
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Not Yet Classified:
STEVEN ABRAMS, PAUL W. SCHMIDT, LORY D. ROSENBERG, Esq. and others
In re: Jacqueline Melcher, et al v. John Richardson
as 18-15052
Debtor:
In the Matter of: JACQUELINE C. MELCHER
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACQUELINE C. MELCHER
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN W. RICHARDSON, Trustee
In re: Jacqueline Melcher, et al v. John Richardson
as 17-17250
Debtor:
In the Matter of: JACQUELINE C. MELCHER
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACQUELINE C. MELCHER
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN W. RICHARDSON, Trustee
In re: Jacqueline Melcher, et al v. John Richardson
as 17-17251
Debtor:
In the Matter of: JACQUELINE C. MELCHER
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACQUELINE C. MELCHER
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN W. RICHARDSON, Trustee
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv06123
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
