Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Smith v. Higgins et al
as 4:2022cv00937
Plaintiff:
John Wesley Smith
Defendant:
Higgins, Calvin, Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Penn v. Lumpkin et al
as 2:2022cv00089
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lamont Penn, John Wesley Smith, Christopher L Penn and others
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, NFN Cabrera, C Bristow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith et al v. Catahoula Parish
as 3:2019cv01094
Plaintiff:
John Wesley Smith and Jill Lossin Smith
Defendant:
School Board of Catahoula Parish
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Smith et al v. Catahoula Parish
as 1:2019cv01094
Plaintiff:
John Wesley Smith and Jill Lossin Smith
Defendant:
School Board of Catahoula Parish
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Concordia Parish Hospital Service District #1 v. Smith
as 1:2013cv03218
Plaintiff:
Concordia Parish Hospital Service District #1
Defendant:
John Wesley Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Beusa Energy Inc et al
as 5:2011cv01269
Plaintiff:
John Wesley Smith
Defendant:
Unknown Insurer and Beusa Energy L L C
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH et al v. AQUA-CHEM, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv79808
Plaintiff:
JOHN WESLEY SMITH and GLORIA R. SMITH
Defendant:
AQUA-CHEM, INC., BORG-WARNER MORSE TEC, INC., CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
John Wesley Smith, et al. v. Aqua-Chem, Inc., et al.
as NCW/1:08-CV-00103
Plaintiff:
John Wesley Smith
Defendant:
Aqua-Chem, Inc
Smith et al v. Aqua-Chem, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00103
Plaintiff:
John Wesley Smith and Gloria R. Smith
Defendant:
Aqua-Chem, Inc., Borg-Warner Morse TEC, Inc., CertainTeed Corporation and others
Counter Claimant:
John Wesley Smith and Gloria R. Smith
Counter Defendant:
General Refractories Company, Georgia Pacific Corporation, National Service Industries, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
