Cases 51 - 60 of 228
Brady v. Gonzalez et al
as 4:2021cv00219
Defendant:
Driver for PTS Jane Doe #2, Alan Sielbeck, Driver for PTS Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Demond T. Brady
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Eugene Police Department et al
as 6:2021cv00082
Plaintiff:
Dylan Wayne Jones
Defendant:
Officer Jon Doe 1, Officer Jon Doe 4, Officer Jon Doe 5 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eric Robinson v. Kairn Borzakian et al
as 2:2021cv00396
Defendant:
Kairn Borzakian, Los Angeles County, District Attorney Ruby Arias and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruiz v. Strow et al
as 4:2020cv04267
Defendant:
Adkison Hilgendorf, Jane/Jon Doe, Shellie A and others
Plaintiff:
Israel Ruiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horntvedt v. Sant et al
as 4:2020cv05193
Defendant:
Shawn P Sant, Laura Mapes, Maureen R Astley and others
Plaintiff:
Lance Ray Horntvedt, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEE v. INCH et al
as 4:2020cv00487
Defendant:
MARK INCH, JON DOE, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES ARTHUR LEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pevia v. Jane/Jon Doe et al
as 1:2020cv02853
Defendant:
Holly Hoover and Jane/Jon Doe
Plaintiff:
Donald R. Pevia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Banks et al v. Doe et al
as 2:2020cv01437
Defendant:
Officer Mcinnes, US Bank Trust Association, Officer Grabonski and others
Plaintiff:
Verna Banks and Ira R Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Bellamy v. Annucci et al
as 6:2020cv06568
Defendant:
MD John Bendheim, Downstate Correctional Facility, Dr. Hentschel and others
Plaintiff:
James Bellamy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv70330
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JON DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
