Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Stone v. Jefferson County Detention, et al
as 20-1311
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFFERSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and JEFFERSON COUNTY DETENTION FACILITY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONATHAN DAVID STONE
Stone v. Jefferson County Detention Facility et al
as 1:2020cv00835
Defendant:
Jefferson County Detention Facility and Jefferson County Sheriff's Department
Plaintiff:
Jonathan David Stone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Amin Rashid
as 16-3836
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
AMIN A. RASHID, AKA Larry Doby Wilson, AKA Jonathan F. Stone, III, AKA Alfred Monger, AKA Otello Karpo, AKA Christine Harriell, AKA Ortello Karpo
Stone v. Morales
as 4:2016cv00290
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Stone
Respondent:
Jose Morales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kane v. Casubolo et al
as 1:2015cv00504
Plaintiff:
Scott A. Kane
Defendant:
James G. Casubolo and Jonathan A. Stone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McDonald v. Stone et al
as 2:2014cv14078
Plaintiff:
Paul McDonald
Defendant:
Jonathan B Stone and Evergreen Lutheran Church
USA v. Amin Rashid
as 11-1618
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
AMIN A. RASHID, AKA Larry Doby Wilson, AKA Jonathan F. Stone, III, AKA Alfred Monger, AKA Otello Karpo, AKA Christine Harriell, AKA Ortello Karpo
Stone et al v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv10323
Plaintiff:
Kristen Stone and Jonathan C. Stone
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Schering Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare AG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Stone, et al v. Maricopa County, et al
as 2:2007cv01801
Plaintiff:
Shirley Stone, Damian M Stone, Jonathan W Stone and others
Defendant:
City of Peoria, David Leonardo, Steve Kemp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
