Cases 1 - 10 of 26
MITCHELL v. CRAWFORD et al
as 1:2025cv02624
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN A. MITCHELL
Defendant:
STEFANIE CRAWFORD, KATE SWEENEY BELL, KERRY FORESTAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mitchell v. General Motors, LLC
as 3:2025cv00271
Plaintiff:
Jonathan E. Mitchell
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
MITCHELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv12803
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN LEE MITCHELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MORRIS et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2023cv01941
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A. MORRIS, JESSE URENA, BRIANNE CROOKS and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
Jonathan Breckenridge-Mitchell v. DST Systems, Inc.
as 23-1983
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Jonathan Breckenridge-Mitchell
Defendant / Appellant:
DST Systems, Inc.
Jonathan Breckenridge-Mitchell v. DST Systems, Inc.
as 21-3623
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Jonathan Breckenridge-Mitchell
Defendant / Appellant:
DST Systems, Inc.
Breckenridge-Mitchell v. DST Systems Inc
as 4:2021cv09072
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Breckenridge-Mitchell
Defendant:
DST Systems Inc
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
New Life South Coast Church v. Baker et al
as 1:2021cv10765
Defendant:
Damon CHAPLIN, Charlie Baker, City of New Bedford and others
Plaintiff:
New Life South Coast Church
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Jonathan Mitchell
as 21-4228
Defendant / Appellant:
JONATHAN ANTWAN MITCHELL
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Romanick et al v. Mitchell et al
as 2:2021cv00065
Plaintiff:
Citru Solution of John's Creek, Inc., LPJP, Inc., Agape Carpet Solutions, LLC and others
Defendant:
John Doe Carpet Cleaning Company and Jonathan Raine Mitchell
Counter Defendant:
Philco, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
