Cases 31 - 40 of 25,640
Travis Dickerson v. Milwaukee County, et al
as 24-1622
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS DICKERSON
Defendant:
MILWAUKEE COUNTY, C.O. JONES and JOHN DOE, or JANE DOE, Kitchen Supervisor
Travis Dickerson v. Milwaukee County, et al
as 24-1621
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS DICKERSON
Defendant:
MILWAUKEE COUNTY, C.O. JONES and JOHN DOE, or JANE DOE, Kitchen Supervisor
Fred Gonzales v. Rashida Jones, et al
as 24-7049
Plaintiff:
Fred Gonzales
Defendant:
Rashida Jones, Owner and CEO of MSNBC, Mark Thompson, Owner and CEO of CNN, Suzanne Scott, CEO of Fox and Friends News Network and others
Robertson v. Jerald K. Graber et al
as 4:2024cv01374
Plaintiff:
Carl W. Robertson
Defendant:
Jerald K. Graber, Terry Gaiser and Hazel B. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Fisher et al
as 2:2024cv00454
Plaintiff:
Dewhite D Johnson
Defendant:
Brandon Fisher, Matthew Burns, Joseph Falke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. NEW KENSINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2024cv00583
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DARNELL JONES
Defendant:
NEW KENSINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, BEN R. MICHAELS and JERRY M. HOBECK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Gonzalez et al
as 3:2024cv00703
Plaintiff:
Dashante Scott Jones
Defendant:
Gonzalez, Nordby, The Town of Newtown Connecticut and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01387
Petitioner:
Matthew Jones
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Guillot v. Wade
as 24-30247
Plaintiff:
Dylan Guillot
Defendant:
Warden Wade, Asst Warden Dear, Deputy Warden Cupp and others
Jones v. Grande et al
as 3:2024cv00701
Plaintiff:
Dashante Scott Jones
Defendant:
Karen Grande and Janine Brennan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
