Cases 31 - 40 of 25,714
Jones v. Strickland et al
as 3:2024cv00468
Petitioner:
Thaddeaus Jones
Respondent:
David Strickland and Baniecia Craig
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Person v. Strada et al
as 3:2024cv00582
Plaintiff:
James Robert Person, Jr.
Defendant:
Frank Strada, Chet O. Crass, Steve Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coates v. Lt. Keistler et al
as 1:2024cv01369
Plaintiff:
Alkein Coates
Defendant:
Lt. Keistler, Tyler, Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Lumpkin
as 24-40337
Petitioner:
Nicholas Nahrue Jones
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Kenneth Creel v. Gary Junker
as 24-6449
Plaintiff:
KENNETH RAY CREEL
Defendant:
GARY JUNKER, DR. ARTHUR CAMPBELL, DEBRA FITZGERALD and others
Watson v. Doe et al
as 5:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
Pierre Terron Watson
Defendant:
John Doe, S. Jones, A. Rich and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Stanfield v. Jones et al
as 6:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
Timothy Stanfield and Randy Jones
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Brian Collier and Unknown Loosier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jones v. State of Louisiana, et al
as 3:2024cv00363
Plaintiff:
Jerome Jones
Defendant:
Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections, Joseph Davis, Gabriel Hebert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00575
Plaintiff:
Mack Jones
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brandt v. Cimarron Correctional Facility and Staff, et al
as 24-6089
Plaintiff:
DONNA R. BRANDT
Defendant:
CIMARRON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY AND STAFF, TERRACE DICKERSON, Former Warden, FNU GRANTE, Assistance Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
