Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Moore v. YMCA of Greater Spartanburg
as 7:2025cv13393
Plaintiff:
Jordan Moore
Defendant:
YMCA of Greater Spartanburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Alexander et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv01546
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Kimberla Alexander, Martell Anderson, Gary Andress and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02254
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Paylor v. Baltimore Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv02746
Defendant:
Timothy Romeo, Daniel Hersl, John Burns and others
Plaintiff:
Keyon Paylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Moore v. Turn Services, LLC
as 2:2024cv02312
Plaintiff:
JORDAN MOORE
Defendant:
TURN SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0971 pi Maritime Personal Injury
Ulysses Feagin v. Mansfield Police Department, et al
as 24-3710
Defendant:
OFFICER MARK BOGGS, OFFICER JORDAN MOORE, OFFICER CLAY BLAIR and others
Plaintiff:
ULYSSES LEE FEAGIN
MOORE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv07536
Plaintiff:
JORDAN MOORE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
NORRIS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv05876
Plaintiff:
JOHNATHAN NORRIS, JOHN RUMPLE, QUASHAWN CYPRESS and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Norris et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00487
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Norris, John Rumple, Quashawn Cypress and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Bowles v. Hersl et al
as 1:2022cv01992
Plaintiff:
Jamar Bowles
Defendant:
Officer DANIEL HERSL, John E. Burns, Jr., Stephen Romey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
