Cases 1 - 10 of 24
MOORE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv07536
Plaintiff:
JORDAN MOORE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
NORRIS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv05876
Plaintiff:
JOHNATHAN NORRIS, JOHN RUMPLE, QUASHAWN CYPRESS and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Norris et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00487
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Norris, John Rumple, Quashawn Cypress and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Bowles v. Hersl et al
as 1:2022cv01992
Plaintiff:
Jamar Bowles
Defendant:
Officer DANIEL HERSL, John E. Burns, Jr., Stephen Romey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Feagin v. Mansfield Police Department et al
as 1:2022cv01201
Plaintiff:
Ulysses Lee Feagin
Defendant:
Mansfield Police Department, Officer Jordan Moore, Officer Mark Boggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. City of Mansfield Division of Police, et al.
as 1:2022cv01000
Plaintiff:
Maxwell Davis
Defendant:
City of Mansfield Division of Police, Jordan Moore and City of Mansfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. City of Mansfield et al
as 2:2022cv02283
Plaintiff:
Maxwell Davis
Defendant:
City of Mansfield, Jordan Moore and City of Mansfield Division of Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carr v. City of Mansfield et al
as 1:2022cv00743
Plaintiff:
Trevor Carr
Defendant:
City of Mansfield and Jordan Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
MOORE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv57060
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JORDAN MOORE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
