Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Portillo et al v. Second Chance, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02660
Defendant:
Second Chance, Inc., Mark Stephen Foster, 300 Painting & Remodeling LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Manuel Portillo and Francis Betancourth
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
DE OLEO PUJOLS v. UNION SUPERMARKET, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv09175
Defendant:
JOSE RIVAS, UNION SUPERMARKET, LLC and RAFAEL ENCARNACION
Plaintiff:
DIONYS YUBERES DE OLEO PUJOLS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00912
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
William Demps v. Clara Smith, et al
as 24-12868
Defendant:
FRANK FREIHOFER, C. E. LANE, CLARA SMITH and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM J. DEMPS
Iraheta, et al. v. Garland
as 24-187
Petitioner:
DILCIA M IRAHETA, FRANCISCO IRAHETA, CARLOS RIVAS IRAHETA and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv04134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Rivas v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 4:2022cv03160
Plaintiff:
Jose Rivas
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Demps v. Jones et al
as 3:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
William Jamal Demps
Defendant:
Julie Jones, Mr. Hodgeson, Clara Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivas Gonzalez v. Garland
as 21-637
Petitioner:
ENRIQUE JOSE RIVAS GONZALEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Meadows on Memorial Owners v. US
as 21-1214
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KAWAL KAREAH, XINDI BENAVENTE, KIMBERLY BOOTH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
