Cases 1 - 10 of 163
Matthew Jones v. Judicial Branch, et al
as 25-1341
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JONES
Defendant:
JUDICIAL BRANCH, CARNEGIE HALL, SEARS TOWER and others
Spinks v. Starr et al
as 3:2025cv00025
Plaintiff:
Joseph Spinks and Joseph Andrew Spinks
Defendant:
Ms. Starr, Unknown John Does and Jane Does, SHU officers "unknown" and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Huangizi Sun v. Joseph Andrew Irving
as 2:2025cv00813
Plaintiff:
Huzngizi Sun
Defendant:
Joseph Andrew Irving, III
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 1441 Contract Real Estate
Weaver v. Director-TDCJ-CID
as 4:2025cv00073
Petitioner:
Joseph Andrew Weaver
Respondent:
Director-TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JONES v. THE JUDICIAL BRANCH et al
as 1:2025cv00040
Defendant:
Nanticoke Hospital, Delaware Psychiatric Center, Dr. Luis David and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cervantes v. Noble
as 4:2024cv00501
Defendant:
Heather Noble
Plaintiff:
Joseph Andrew Cervantes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States v. Joseph Luckett
as 24-3052
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Joseph Andrew Luckett
The People of the State of California v. Remenar II
as 3:2024cv01800
Plaintiff:
The People of the State of California
Defendant:
Joseph Andrew Remenar II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Hobbs v. Ray
as 5:2024cv00195
Petitioner:
Joseph Andrew Hobbs
Respondent:
Warden Heather Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Spinks v. John does and Janes et al
as 5:2024cv00133
Respondent:
Ms. Ray, SHU Officers, Unknown Official and others
Petitioner:
Joseph Spinks and Joseph Andrew Spinks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
