Cases 1 - 10 of 442
United States of America v. Cannarozzi
as 24-7479
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JOSEPH ANTHONY CANNAROZZI
Favors v. Walkenhorst et al
as 0:2024cv03934
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe Representatives and Walkenhorst
Plaintiff:
Joseph Anthony Favors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Santistevan v. Marquez et al
as 2:2024cv08857
Defendant:
Suzy Marquez
Plaintiff:
Joseph Anthony Santistevan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Joseph Favors v. Jodi Harpstead
as 24-2959
Respondent:
Jodi Harpstead
Petitioner:
Joseph Anthony Favors
Favors v. Davis et al
as 0:2024cv03303
Defendant:
Jodi Harpstead, John Doe, Marcus Barnes and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Anthony Favors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. Nikolas Gene Carter et al
as 2:2024cv06954
Defendant:
Oscar Jackson, Jr., KPoP Republic, Paul Edward Huston and others
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
THE ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF PATERSON, NEW JERSEY et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE et al
as 2:2024cv08350
Plaintiff:
THE ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF PATERSON, NEW JERSEY, FATHER ARMANDO DIAZ VIZCARA JR., FATHER JOEMIN KHARLO CHONG PARINAS and others
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv03063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1691 Equal Credit Opportunity Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv03060
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1691 Equal Credit Opportunity Act
Joseph Daniels v. Vincent Gore
as 24-6710
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH ANTHONY DANIELS
Defendant:
VINCENT GORE, Medical Doctor
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
