Cases 1 - 10 of 67
Carter v. Long
as 3:2025cv01141
Plaintiff:
Joseph Carter
Defendant:
Long
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoel v. Prouse et al
as 0:2025cv02342
Plaintiff:
Robert Brooks Hoel
Defendant:
Alexander Prouse, Joseph Carter, Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BANNON v. HAMILTON COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2025cv00351
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH CARTER BANNON
Defendant:
HAMILTON COUNTY JAIL, MICHELLE, KRISTENA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BANNON v. BOUERS et al
as 1:2025cv00255
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH CARTER BANNON
Defendant:
BOUERS, UNKNOWN JAIL STAFF and UNKNOWN OFFICER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Associated Industries Insurance Company, Inc. v. Hill et al
as 1:2025cv00043
Plaintiff:
Associated Industries Insurance Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Joseph Carter Hill, Carter Hill Construction, LLC, Robert Ashley Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Roberts et al v. Carter Hill Construction, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00460
Defendant:
Carter Hill Construction, LLC and Joseph Carter Hill
Plaintiff:
Melanie Woodward Roberts and Robert Ashley Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Carter v. Pike County, MS
as 5:2024cv00093
Defendant:
Pike County, MS
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Tyree Joseph Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. USA
as 3:2024cv00193
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
David Joseph Carter, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Carter v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00731
Plaintiff:
Joseph Carter
Defendant:
Semple and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Strogoteanu et al
as 0:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Ervin Lamar James
Defendant:
Darren Mark Ficek, Mihai Strogoteanu and Taylor Joseph Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
