Cases 1 - 10 of 12
MUNOZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv34472
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH MUNOZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv09661
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Munoz et al v. ACA Contracting Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv03824
Defendant:
Diana Amoroso, ACA Contracting Inc. and Michael Amoroso
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Oumano-Williams, Dominick Ruvolo, Joseph Munoz and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Munoz v. Anderson et al
as 2:2018cv00495
Plaintiff:
John Joseph Munoz, Jr
Defendant:
Michael Anderson, Robert Velez, Meghan C Lindberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In Re Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Munoz
as 2:2018mc00016
Petitioner:
Office of Disciplinary Counsel
Respondent:
Alfred Joseph Munoz
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Followell et al v. Weitz Heavy Industrial, LLC et al
as 4:2017cv02280
Plaintiff:
Jason Followell , Ruben Followell and Joseph Munoz
Defendant:
Weitz Heavy Industrial, LLC and The Weitz Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Vasquez v. The City of East Chicago, et al
as 2:2017cv00229
Defendant:
East Chicago City of , Hammond City of , Eric Godoy and others
Plaintiff:
Gabriela Erica Vasquez and Theresa Paramo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Munoz v. 3M Company
as 0:2016cv04414
Plaintiff:
Joseph Munoz
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CHANDLER v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2016cv01491
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY RAY CHANDLER, SR.
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS , CHARLES SAMUELS , CHARLES PORCO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Joseph Munoz et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., a Delaware Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv07400
Defendant:
Does and Wells Fargo Bank NA
Plaintiff:
Amparo Munoz and Joseph Munoz
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
