Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Davis v. Rinaldi
as 3:2019cv00504
Defendant:
Monica Rinaldi, Peterson, Burgos and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel A. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roach v. Does
as 3:2018cv00104
Plaintiff:
Joseph Roach
Defendant:
Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roach v. White
as 3:2016cv00300
Petitioner:
Joseph Roach
Respondent:
Randy White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mendez v. Radec Corporation
as 12-4831
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Patrick Mendez, on behalf of himself and all other employees similarly situated, Jerry T. Griffo, Jr., Adrenne R. Secor and others
Defendant:
Abeck Electrical Contractors, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
Radec Corporation, Mark Shortino, Raymond Shortino and others
Mendez v. Radec Corporation
as 12-4845
Plaintiff - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Patrick Mendez, on behalf of himself and all other employees similarly situated, Jerry T. Griffo, Jr., Adrenne R. Secor and others
Defendant:
Abeck Electrical Contractors, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
Tradesource, Tek Systems, Techengineering Services, Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Radec Corporation, Mark Shortino and Raymond Shortino
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv00061
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Anthony Roach v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 12-20023
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTHONY JOSEPH ROACH
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Roach v. Thaler
as 4:2011cv01941
Petitioner:
Anthony Joseph Roach
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mendez, et al v. The Radec Corp., et al
as 6:2003cv06342
Plaintiff:
Patrick Mendez , Jerry T. Griffo, Jr. , Adrenne R. Secor and others
Defendant:
The Radec Corporation , Mark Shortino , Raymond Shortino and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
