Cases 31 - 40 of 119
Welch v. Central Regional Jail, Prime Care Medical
as 5:2022cv00031
Plaintiff:
Joshua Thomas Welch
Defendant:
Central Regional Jail, Prime Care Medical and Correctional Officer Dill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00450
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Miller v. Arcipreste et al
as 6:2022cv00052
Plaintiff:
Joshua Thomas Miller
Defendant:
Samuel Arcipreste, Cortez Williams and J. Barrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Stafford et al
as 6:2022cv00053
Plaintiff:
Joshua Thomas Miller
Defendant:
John Stafford, David Langston, Pam Pace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bates v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
Joshua Thomas Bates
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Thomas v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
as 4:2021cv00946
Plaintiff:
Joshua Thomas
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller v. Lumpkin
as 21-11207
Petitioner / Appellant:
Joshua Thomas Miller
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Paiva et al v. Ropchock et al
as 2:2021cv01898
Plaintiff:
Roc Cameron Fetuao Paiva and Rolette Paiva
Defendant:
Joshua Thomas Ropchock, Fedex Ground Package System, Inc. and Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THOMAS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv59540
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA THOMAS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VOJTISEK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv53803
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA THOMAS VOJTISEK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
