Cases 1 - 10 of 916
Ellis v. Johnson
as 6:2024cv01387
Defendant:
Judge K. Johnson and Jacob L. Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON-FIKE v. LLT MANAGEMENT LLC et al
as 3:2024cv05607
Defendant:
LLT MANAGEMENT LLC, LTL MANAGEMENT LLC, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC and others
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH K JOHNSON-FIKE
Not Yet Classified:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jonassen v. Jacquez, et al.
as 24-2334
Plaintiff:
MARTIN JOSEPH JONASSEN
Defendant:
I. JACQUEZ, D. SUH, B. CRAY and others
ALLEN v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2024cv00323
Plaintiff:
JULIUS ALLEN
Defendant:
U/K JOHNSON CORRECTIONAL OFFICER, U/K ARNOLD LIEUTENANT, U/K VANDIVNER CORRECTIONAL OFFICER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Valdivia-Nunez v. Rippenkroger et al
as 4:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Esteban Valdivia-Nunez
Defendant:
Carl Rippenkroger, Darwin Johnson, Rebecca Bowker and others
Interested Party:
H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Anderson v. Clarke et al
as 7:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
John David Anderson, III
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Leslie J. Fleming, Beth E. Cabell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Clarke et al
as 2:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
John David Anderson, III
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Leslie J. Fleming, Beth E. Cabell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. United States of America et al
as 5:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
DiAngelo K. Johnson
Defendant:
United States of America and USP Coleman II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
