Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Davies v. Wead et al
as 2:2024cv00511
Plaintiff:
Tobius Davies
Defendant:
S Wead, J Bradley and K Johnston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strahan v. McCafferty, et al
as 23-1734
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD MAXIMUS STRAHAN
Defendant / Appellee:
LANDYA B. MCCAFFERTY, ANDREA K. JOHNSTONE and STEVEN J. MCAULIFFE
Strahan v. McCafferty et al
as 1:2023cv00297
Plaintiff:
Richard Maximus Strahan
Defendant:
Landya McCafferty, Andrea K Johnstone and Steven J. McAuliffe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
JOHNSTON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv03463
Plaintiff:
HERBIE K JOHNSTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JOHNSTON v. KALLIS
as 2:2022cv00390
Petitioner:
BRIAN K. JOHNSTON
Respondent:
STEVEN KALLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Verogna v. Johnstone, et al
as 22-1364
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SENSA VEROGNA
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREA K. JOHNSTONE, in her personal capacity, STEVEN J. MCAULIFFE, in his personal capacity, JULIE E. SCHWARTZ and others
Holloway v. Sununu et al
as 1:2021cv00865
Plaintiff:
Dale E. Holloway, Jr.
Defendant:
Chris Sununu, NH Attorney General Gordon MacDonald, John J. Coughlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holloway v. Sununu et al
as 1:2021cv11585
Plaintiff:
Dale E. Holloway, Jr.,
Defendant:
Chris Sununu, Gordon MacDonald, John J. Coughlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sandra Nigl v. Cathy Jess, et al
as 20-3112
Defendant / Appellee:
DAWN CRIM, DANIEL SCHROEDER, DEDE MORGAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SANDRA K. NIGL, formerly know as SANDRA K. JOHNSTON, PH. D
Derrick Wheatt, et al v. City of East Cleveland, OH, et al
as 20-4017
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LAURESE GLOVER, DERRICK WHEATT and EUGENE JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF EAST CLEVELAND, OH
Defendant / Appellant:
VINCENT K. JOHNSTONE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
