Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Doe v. Bessac et al
as 4:2023cv00684
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Daniel Bessac, Bobby York, Bryan Jay Koon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Gogel, et al v. Smith, et al
as 3:2022cv00239
Plaintiff:
Gilbrith Gogel, Puranjyot Chaggar, Ashanti Holland and others
Defendant:
William Smith, Antoinette V. Irving, E. M. Konopka and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROSS v. BOGER et al
as 1:2021cv00837
Plaintiff:
GERMINIQUE S. ROSS
Defendant:
J. C. BOGER, J. H. PRISK, Z. JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
R. E. et al v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00591
Defendant:
JUUL Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc. and Philip Morris USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
P. K. E. and R. E.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
K. E. v. Raleigh Heart Clinic, Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv00124
Defendant:
The West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources, Raleigh Heart Clinic, Inc., John Does 1 through 10 and others
Plaintiff:
K. E.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv14893
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Transmission of Bankruptcy Reference
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014mc00086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Rochester v. Harwell et al
as 6:2013cv01247
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
R B Harwell, NFN Florian, K E Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Rochester v. Thomas et al
as 6:2013cv00854
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
K E Thomas, C Cooper, 5 Parole Judges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Emmanuel Sewell v. Acting Commissioner
as 12-6680
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EMMANUEL EDWARD SEWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
J. MICHAEL STOUFFER, BOBBY P. SHEARIN, CAPTAIN STOTTER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
