Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Gordon v. Quinlan et al
as 3:2016cv00867
Defendant:
CollectCorp, Inc., Federal Student Aid, Raymond J. Quinlan and others
Plaintiff:
Brenda K. Gordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gordon v. Van Hagen et al
as 3:2016cv00666
Defendant:
Stephen K. Bushong, Jean K. Maurer, Multnomah County and others
Plaintiff:
Brenda K. Gordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Russell Gordon
as 15-2941
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RUSSELL K. GORDON
Peele v. Annucci et al
as 9:2015cv00317
Plaintiff:
Kenney Peele
Defendant:
Robert M. Donah, Curtis E. Smith, Paul L. Fletcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rojas v. Dionne, et al
as 14-1396
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANKY ROJAS
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID DIONNE, Superintendent, Hillsborough County DOC, in his individual capacity, B. MARINEAU, Deputy Chief of Security, in his individual capacity, MARC CUSSON, Captain, in his individual capacity and others
Gordon et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv33299
Plaintiff:
Diana K. Gordon and Thomas Jeffrey Gordon
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rojas et al v. Dionne et al
as 1:2013fp00365
Defendant:
G. Antilus, D. Archambault, J. Barbera and others
Plaintiff:
Franky Rojas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00746
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
PNC Bank, N.A. v. Welsh Realty, LLC et al
as 5:2013cv00203
Plaintiff:
PNC Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Welsh Realty, LLC, Welsh Paper Company, K. Gordon Welsh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
USA v. Clayton Gordon
as 12-11727
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CLAYTON K. GORDON, a.k.a. Kirk Clayton
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
