Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 207
Hobbs v. Telfair State Prison et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00027
Plaintiff: Quadray Hobbs
Defendant: Telfair State Prison, Telfair State Prison Staff, Unit Manager Karen Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL et al v. KONINKLIJKE et al
as 2:2023cv00090
Plaintiff: SANDREA K. HILL and JERRY L. HILL
Defendant: PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC, PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC,, PHILIPS HOLDING USA INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other
Russell HillIn re: Russell Hill
as 22-60665
Petitioner: In re: Russell K. Hill
Hill v. Loden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00184
Petitioner: Russell K. Hill
Respondent: Warden C. Loden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hill v. Loden
as 2:2022cv00150
Plaintiff: Russell K. Hill
Defendant: Warden C. Loden
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HILL v. GAMBILL et al
as 2:2022cv00443
Plaintiff: JAMES K. HILL
Defendant: HUNTER GAMBILL, JOHNNIE BOHNERT, JOSH CLARKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hill v. Loden
as 4:2022cv00159
Petitioner: Russell K. Hill
Respondent: Warden C. Loden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Loden
as 22-60413
Petitioner / Appellant: Russell K. Hill
Respondent / Appellee: Chris Loden, Warden
Hill v. Loden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00040
Petitioner: Russell K. Hill
Respondent: Warden C. Loden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
HILL v. CLAY COUNTY PROSECUTOR OFFICE
as 2:2022cv00061
Plaintiff: JAMES K. HILL
Defendant: CLAY COUNTY PROSECUTOR OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?