Cases 1 - 10 of 13
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Pacheco et al
as 1:2017cv00054
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Manual O Pacheco, Debra K. Pacheco, Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Taxation and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
Pacheco v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv07005
Plaintiff:
Renee K. Pacheco
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., Tissue Science Laboratories Limited, Ethicon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv02246
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Colonial Surety Company v. Uni-Con Floors, Inc. et al
as 6:2009mc00152
Plaintiff:
Colonial Surety Company
Defendant:
Uni-Con Floors, Inc., Katherine L. Hebert, Scott Hebert and others
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00524
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Colonial Surety Co. v. Uni-Con Floors, Inc., et al
as 08-1393
Plaintiff - Appellee:
COLONIAL SURETY CO.
Defendant:
UNI-CON FLOORS, INC., KATHERINE L. HERBERT, SCOTT HERBERT and others
Defendant - Appellant:
AVI WEIZMAN
Colonial Surety Co. v. Uni-Con Floors, Inc., et al
as 08-1065
Plaintiff - Appellee:
COLONIAL SURETY CO.
Defendant:
UNI-CON FLOORS, INC., KATHERINE L. HERBERT, SCOTT HERBERT and others
Defendant - Appellant:
AVI WEIZMAN
Haney v. Bondoc et al
as 1:2007cv01222
Plaintiff:
Monte Haney
Defendant:
J. Bondoc, E. Garnett, Yasuda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haney v. Bondoc et al
as 2:2007cv01510
Plaintiff:
Monte Haney
Defendant:
J. Bondoc, E. Garnett, Yasuda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haney v. Adams et al
as 1:2007cv01104
Plaintiff:
Monte Haney
Defendant:
Darrel G Adams, T. Heing, L - Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
