Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Warren v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2023cv00650
Plaintiff:
Dajun K Warren
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Warren v. Hibpshman
as 3:2013cv00115
Petitioner:
Thomas K. Warren
Respondent:
Robert Hibpshman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roberta K Warren et al v. United States of America
as 2:2012cv06210
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Elias T Warren and Roberta K Warren
Unknown:
Steven D Gitman and Steven D Gitman
Warren v. Astrue
as 2:2012cv00335
Plaintiff:
David K Warren
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Warren v. CONMED, Inc. et al
as 6:2011cv06263
Defendant:
CONMED, Inc., Linn County, Tim Mueller and others
Plaintiff:
Larry K. Warren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv01876
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Colon et al v. AstraZeneca LP et al
as 4:2009cv04158
Plaintiff:
Angel Colon, Daniel Anderson, Althea Block and others
Defendant:
AstraZeneca LP, AstraZeneca LP, AstraZeneca LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Colon et al v. AstraZeneca LP et al
as 3:2009cv04158
Plaintiff:
Angel Colon, Daniel Anderson, Althea Block and others
Defendant:
AstraZeneca LP, AstraZeneca LP, AstraZeneca LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DeNicola v. Women's Specialty Care LLP et al
as 2:2008cv01590
Plaintiff:
Eva L. DeNicola
Defendant:
Women's Specialty Care LLP, K. Warren Volker and Tammy Kelly-Layten
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Warren v. Marriott International, Inc.
as 1:2008cv00217
Plaintiff:
Susan K. Warren
Defendant:
Marriott International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
