Cases 21 - 30 of 3,763
KANE v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv03465
Plaintiff:
LEAH KANE
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC. and others
Not Yet Classified:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kane v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00268
Plaintiff:
Sara Kane
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Kane v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00269
Plaintiff:
Sara Kane, as Personal Representative and Sara Kane
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
United States of America v. Diallo
as 24-1255
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
AMADOU KANE DIALLO
Muhammad v. Kane
as 3:2024cv00377
Plaintiff:
Walid A. Muhammad
Defendant:
Judge Kane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baltas v. Salisbury, Jr. et al
as 1:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Joe J. Baltas
Defendant:
Wayne T. Salisbury, Jr., Rui Diniz, Barry Weiner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Custis v. Exmore Police Department et al
as 3:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
William Parke Custis
Defendant:
Exmore Police Department, Adam Zieger, Jonathan Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brodsky v. Dun et al
as 1:2024cv01656
Plaintiff:
Joshua D Brodsky
Defendant:
Kat Dun, Nicole Gold, Watermark Apartments LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Kane County Child Support Agency v. Monroy
as 1:2024cv01561
Petitioner:
Kane County Child Support Agency
Defendant:
Jesus Monroy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
United States v. Kane Youngman
as 24-1369
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Kane Youngman
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
