Cases 21 - 30 of 42
Mitchell v. AbbVie Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv05168
Plaintiff:
Dion Keith Mitchell
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc., Abbott Laboratories, Unimed Pharmaceuticals, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00605
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Seneca Insurance Company, Inc. v. Safeway Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00174
Plaintiff:
Seneca Insurance Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Safeway Group, Inc., WH-Tri County Shopping Center, LLC and Keith Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00942
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv06186
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Aid Names Being Fictitious, The Persons Intended Being Those Who Aided And Abetted The Unlawful Con:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Mitchell v. USA
as 4:2015cv00152
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jeromey Keith Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Mitchell v. Ponde et al
as 1:2015cv02824
Plaintiff:
Keith Mitchell
Defendant:
Joseph Ponde, Tony Durante and Dunbar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IN RE: SUBPOENA MATTER
as 1:2015mc00138
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
GARY GATHERS and KEITH MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash Subpoenas
Mitchell v. Connecticut Region 14 District Probate Court et al
as 3:2014cv00630
Plaintiff:
Lynne Mitchell
Defendant:
Connecticut Region 14 District Probate Court , Jennifer L. Berkenstock , State of Connecticut Probate Division and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Jeromey Mitchell
as 14-4144
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JEROMEY KEITH MITCHELL, a/k/a Kaos
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
