Cases 1 - 10 of 4,057
Alexander v. Joint Base Andrews et al
as 8:2024cv01240
Plaintiff:
Kurt Alexander
Defendant:
Joint Base Andrews, Secretary Frank Kendall, Jason Stack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Kendall Smith v. U.S. Judge Paula Xinis
as 24-1365
Plaintiff:
KENDALL R. SMITH
Defendant:
U.S. JUDGE PAULA XINIS, STATE OF MARYLAND and UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lanier v. Barlow et al
as 2:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Kristi Lanier
Defendant:
Sheriff Jeff Barlow, Corporal B. A. Shinaberry, Deputy Kendal Ober and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nathan Carroll v. Northampton Restaurants, Inc.
as 24-1354
Plaintiff:
NATHAN E. CARROLL, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, GERALDINE P. CORRIGAN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, CRYSTAL A. BATEMAN and others
Defendant:
NORTHAMPTON RESTAURANTS, INC., d/b/a Aberdeen Barn Steakhouse
Hinton v. Home Depot, Inc.
as 8:2024cv01189
Plaintiff:
kendall hinton
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
hinton v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 8:2024cv01169
Plaintiff:
kendall hinton
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal - Employment Discrimination (Race)
Stansbury v. Harry et al
as 1:2024cv00686
Plaintiff:
Kareem Stansbury
Defendant:
Laurel Harry, Michael Gourley, Zachary Molsak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ames v. Chisago County et al
as 0:2024cv01397
Plaintiff:
James Ames
Defendant:
Chisago County, Adam Cinelli, Matthew Jacobson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
