Cases 31 - 40 of 159
Jarvis Campbell v. Kenneth Davis, et al
as 21-11250
Defendant / Appellee:
KENNETH DAVIS, D.A. of Russell County, RUSSELL COUNTY DISTRICT COURT, PHENIX CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JARVIS MARCEL CAMPBELL
Davis v. Scarborough et al
as 3:2021cv00132
Defendant:
Rocky Lutz and Shante Scarborough
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Dallas Cty TX Child Support
as 21-10275
Defendant / Appellee:
Tanner Joy Feast, Individual Official Capacity Court Reporter Contractor for 254th Title IV-D Court, Dallas County Texas Child Support Enforcement Agency, Michael J. Oneill, Individual Official Capacity Judge Contractor for 254th Title IV-D Court and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mayford Kenneth Davis, Jr.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv07508
Plaintiff:
KENNETH DAVIS
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Aimmune Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv04518
Defendant:
Brett Haumann, Kate Falberg, Greg Behar and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Davis
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv84081
Plaintiff:
KENNETH DAVIS
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00591
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Appel v. Hayut et al
as 1:2020cv06265
Defendant:
Yosef Meir Cohen, Hon. Esther Hayut, Dr. David Reich and others
Plaintiff:
Ronit D. Appel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv02705
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
