Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00760
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Williams v. Constant et al
as 3:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
Nial Sherwood Williams
Defendant:
Christopher Constant, Thomas Bruce, Michael C. Carpenter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Southard v. McCoy et al
as 2:2021mc00038
Plaintiff:
Sean C. Southard
Defendant:
Jason McCoy and Kenneth McCoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963
Southard v. McCoy et al
as 2:2021mc00037
Plaintiff:
Sean C. Southard
Defendant:
Jason McCoy and Kenneth McCoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963
McCoy et al v. REV Recreation Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv01014
Plaintiff:
Kenneth McCoy and Candace Lee Bell
Defendant:
REV Recreation Group, Inc., Bank of the West and La Mesa R.V. Center, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
McCoy et al v. REV Recreation Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2021at00517
Plaintiff:
Kenneth McCoy and Candace Lee Bell
Defendant:
REV Recreation Group, Inc., La Mesa R.V. Center, Inc, and Bank of the West
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
McCoy v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv00524
Plaintiff:
Kenneth McCoy
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
McCoy v. Colvin
as 8:2016cv00524
Plaintiff:
Kenneth McCoy
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
McCoy et al v. Progressive Northwestern Ins. Co.
as 3:2016cv00002
Plaintiff:
Kenneth McCoy and Michele McCoy
Defendant:
Progressive Northwestern Ins. Co.
3rd_party_plaintiff:
Progressive Northwestern Ins. Co.
3rd_party_defendant:
Safeco Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Osbaldo Elizondo v. Brad Livingston, et al
as 14-11203
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OSBALDO ELIZONDO
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAD LIVINGSTON, Executive Director, BARRY L. MARTIN, Senior Warden, JAMES BEACH, Assistant Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
