Cases 1 - 10 of 1,422
SILVERBERG v. DUPONT DE NEMOURS INC. et al
as 2:2024cv00924
Plaintiff:
RICHARD J. SILVERBERG
Defendant:
DUPONT DE NEMOURS INC., DOW, INC., CORTEVA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Richard Silverberg v. DuPont De Nemours Inc, et al
as 24-1775
Plaintiff:
RICHARD J. SILVERBERG, Esq.
Defendant:
DUPONT DE NEMOURS INC, DOW INC, CORTEVA INC and others
Richard Silverberg v. DuPont De Nemours Inc, et al
as 24-1774
Plaintiff:
RICHARD J. SILVERBERG, Esq.
Defendant:
DUPONT DE NEMOURS INC, DOW INC, CORTEVA INC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00156
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 ada Removal- Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01640
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Rysheid El v. Philadelphia Parking Authority, et al
as 24-1345
Plaintiff:
RYSHEID MALIK EL
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA PARKING AUTHORITY, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JAMES F. KENNEY, Mayor and others
Kenney v. King
as 9:2024cv00465
Petitioner:
Erik G. Kenney
Respondent:
M.J. King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kenney et al v. Dallas County Texas
as 3:2024cv00809
Plaintiff:
Matthew Kenney and Gregory Benedict
Defendant:
Dallas County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KENNEY v. LLT MANAGEMENT LLC et al
as 3:2024cv04287
Defendant:
LLT MANAGEMENT LLC, LTL MANAGEMENT LLC, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC and others
Plaintiff:
DOROTHY KENNEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kenney v. CBOCS West, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00309
Plaintiff:
Marcia Kenney
Defendant:
CBOCS West Inc. doing business as Cracker Barrel Old County Store #226
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
