Cases 1 - 10 of 73
Davidson v. JRN, Inc.
as 6:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Zelda Davidson
Defendant:
JRN, Inc. doing business as Kentucky Fried Chicken
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Davidson v. JRN, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Zelda Davidson
Defendant:
JRN, Inc. doing business as Kentucky Fried Chicken
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad - Americans with Disabilities Act
Council et al v. Ivey et al
as 2:2023cv00712
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Council, Kinetik Justice, Lee Edward Moore, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Steve Marshall, Leigh Gwathney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS JR. v. TRENTON POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 3:2023cv22807
Plaintiff:
ROBERT EARL DAVIS JR.
Defendant:
TRENTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McConnell v. Ampex Brands of West Virginia, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00466
Plaintiff:
Earl McConnell and Donna McConnell
Defendant:
Ampex Brands of West Virginia, Inc., Kentucky Fried Chicken, KFC US, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00773
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
ADAN v. KENTUCKY FRIED CHICKEN et al
as 1:2023cv00022
Plaintiff:
SALEEBAN ADAN
Defendant:
KENTUCKY FRIED CHICKEN, ZAXBY'S and BANJAGALAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv01328
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
