Cases 71 - 80 of 91
Bateman v. Jamaludeen et al
as 2:2011cv00602
Plaintiff:
Michael Bateman
Defendant:
Jamaludeen, Jane Doe and Kevin Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2011cv06093
Petitioner:
KEVIN TAYLOR
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
TAYLOR v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2011cv05367
Petitioner:
KEVIN TAYLOR
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Taylor v. State of Wisconsin
as 2:2011cv00736
Petitioner:
Kevin Taylor
Respondent:
State of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv02185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Bray et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2011cv01230
Plaintiff:
Jonell Bray , Kevin Taylor , Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc, Defendant's Liaison Counsel and Defendant's Lead Counsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gray v. Ector et al
as 3:2011cv00029
Plaintiff:
Charles Gray
Defendant:
Moses Ector , Jeffrey Sheppard , Raymond Gates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pollonais et al v. National Construction Rental, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00414
Plaintiff:
Richard Adams, Pedro Cabrera, Juan Cochrane and others
Defendant:
John Does #1-10 and National Construction Rental, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Dingus v. Tennessee Department of Safety et al
as 3:2010cv00435
Plaintiff:
De'Ossie Dingus
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Tennessee Department of Safety, Tennessee Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Taylor v. ConAgra Foods Packaged Foods, LLC
as 3:2010cv00732
Defendant:
ConAgra Foods Packaged Foods, LLC
Plaintiff:
Kevin Taylor, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
