Cases 11 - 20 of 3,948
Michael Dobson v. Dr. Thompson
as 24-6403
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DOBSON
Defendant:
DR. THOMPSON, HAROLD W. CLARKE, STEVEN HERRICK and others
Early v. Callejas et al
as 2:2024cv11140
Plaintiff:
Olajuwan Early
Defendant:
Abigail Callejas, Jerome Warfield, Ricardo Moore and others
KING V. SHAPIRO et al
as 2:2024cv00633
Plaintiff:
SHAWN KING
Defendant:
PA GOVERNOR JOSH SHAPIRO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
AlBritton v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 7:2024cv00283
Plaintiff:
DeVinche Javon AlBritton
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Counselor Kayla Mallory, David Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Cross v. Kings County Sheriff et al
as 1:2024cv00501
Plaintiff:
Jerome Lee Cross
Defendant:
Kings County Sheriff, Senior Dep. Schrieber, Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Albert St. Clair, Jr. v. DeAngelo Anthony, et al
as 24-11302
Plaintiff:
ALBERT LEE ST. CLAIR, JR.
Defendant:
DEANGELO M. ANTHONY, DEREK R. GULLEDGE, ERIC STROM and others
Hawn v. Clallam County Jail et al
as 3:2024cv05310
Plaintiff:
Daniel WJ Hawn
Defendant:
Clallam County Jail, Brian King, Clallam County Medical and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hinson v. J.C.C.F. Medical Department Corr Healths et al
as 1:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Hinson
Defendant:
J.C.C.F. Medical Department Corr Healths, Dr. FNU Wozniack, Kim King, . and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jasper Frazier v. Victoria Kuhn, et al
as 24-1736
Plaintiff:
JASPER FRAZIER
Defendant:
VICTORIA L. KUHN, Acting Commissioner, PATRICK NOGAN, Administrator, ANTHONY GONGI, Association Administrator and others
Snead v. Covington VA
as 7:2024cv00274
Plaintiff:
King Cedric Omar Snead
Defendant:
Covington VA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
