Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Kuerbitz v. Bouchard et al
as 2:2024cv10774
Plaintiff:
Arnold Kuerbitz
Defendant:
Michael J. Bouchard, Karen McDonald and John and Jane Does
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
4Th Party Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Li et al v. Flannery et al
as 1:2021cv11898
Plaintiff:
Pro Se Party Yong Li, Swaida Monica, Fharah Ladey and others
Defendant:
Robert Flannery, Peter McAnespie, Karen McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
David Chaplin v. Beth Anderson, et al
as 19-1506
Defendant / Appellee:
GARRY M. GREENBERG, JUDGE KAREN MCDONALD, SARAHANNE B. ANDERSON-KEVELIN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID KENT CHAPLIN
Wright v. North Charleston Police Department City of North Charleston, City of et al
as 9:2010cv00652
Plaintiff:
Felicia Lanelle Wright
Defendant:
North Charleston Police Department City of North Charleston, City of , Charleston County Detention Center , Charleston, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Bannamon et al v. City of Fayetteville et al
as 5:2010cv00069
Plaintiff:
Valparisia R. Bannamon and Moses W. Robinson
Defendant:
City of Fayetteville, Dale Iman, Anthony G. Chavonne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McDonald v. Dolgencorp, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv02175
Defendant:
Dolgencorp, Inc., Dollar General Partners, Dolgencorp of New York, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Karen McDonald
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bannamon et al v. Iman et al
as 5:2009cv00115
Plaintiff:
Valparisia Bannamon and Moses W. Robinson
Defendant:
Dale Iman, Anthony G. Chavonne, Wesley A. Meredith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McDonald Marston v. U.S. Department of Education
as 2:2009cv00065
Plaintiff:
Karen McDonald Marston
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Education
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
