Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Wallace Mitchell v. Harley Lappin, et al
as 21-3355
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WALLACE MITCHELL
Defendant:
HARLEY LAPPIN, Director-Bureau of Prisons, THOMAS R. KANE, Director Federal Bureau of Prisons, HARRELL WATTS, Administrator/Bureau of Prisons and others
KARPEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv66176
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS PETER KARPEN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv05504
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
KARPEN v. AEARO HOLDING LLC et al
as 7:2021cv56283
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS KARPEN
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mitchell v. Lappin et al
as 1:2021cv00163
Defendant:
Kevin Bittenbender, Mark Preoria, David C. Young and others
Plaintiff:
Wallace Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stenseth v. Karpen et al
as 4:2019cv04117
Defendant:
Deb Bowman, State of South Dakota, Department of Social Services and others
Plaintiff:
Robert A. Stenseth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Ari Bailey, et al
as 18-1956
Petitioner:
In re: ARI BAILEY
Respondent:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, CONNELLY, DELBERT G. SAUERS and others
Nominal Respondent:
RICHARD P. CONABOY
Abel et al v. Willis of Colorado Inc et al
as 3:2016cv02601
Plaintiff:
Abel, Stanford Kauffman, Bradley J Davis and others
Defendant:
Willis of Colorado Inc, Willis Ltd and WGH Holdings Ltd
Interested Party:
Ralph S Janvey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 - Diversity: Securities Fraud
Husband v. Malakoski et al
as 3:2014cv01146
Plaintiff:
Eunice Husband
Defendant:
J. Malakoski, S. Argueta, J. Carpenter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chandler v. Samuels et al
as 1:2013cv01879
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ray Chandler
Defendant:
Charles Samuels, Lawrence Karpen and Danielle Mink
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
